1060 Brands 3354 Models 24117 Galleries 15247 Typefaces 6273 Patents
Home » Royal » Ensign » 1964 #EN 5746979
1964 Royal Ensign Serial # EN 5746979 1964 Royal Ensign typewriter, Serial # EN 5746979 Russell Knight's 1964 Royal Ensign typewriter. 2026-01-15 From the Virtual Typewriter Collection of Russell Knight: 1964 Royal Ensign Serial # EN 5746979 Very dirty with the carriage return leaver spring missing/broken, as is the type guide spring. Not dissimilar to other Royal ultraportables.

Serial number is EN 5746979 but the TWB says that Royal Ensigns started with EN 5981345. I brought this to the attention of Munk and he said "it’s not the first time that the Royal factory parts manuals were incorrect on model start serials, especially those models originating in non-US factories ... It’s an interesting question why the factory parts manuals would be wrong (especially using such exact serials, usually a sign of validity). It would be worth pulling the anomalies (machines like yours in the galleries – there are at least a couple, but I don’t recall which) and maybe checking when the ads for this model appear in newspapers. That might illuminate a date mismatch or something. However, I’ve always assumed that these serial cutoffs for models might indicate that the model went through some design change and that the note means something like 'serials after this for this model have *these* parts' as opposed to earlier parts lists."

1964 Royal Ensign #EN 5746979

Status: Sightings
Hunter: Russell Knight (Arcae)
Created: 01-14-2026 at 09:43AM
Last Edit: 01-15-2026 at 08:10AM


Description:

Very dirty with the carriage return leaver spring missing/broken, as is the type guide spring. Not dissimilar to other Royal ultraportables.

Serial number is EN 5746979 but the TWB says that Royal Ensigns started with EN 5981345. I brought this to the attention of Munk and he said "it’s not the first time that the Royal factory parts manuals were incorrect on model start serials, especially those models originating in non-US factories ... It’s an interesting question why the factory parts manuals would be wrong (especially using such exact serials, usually a sign of validity). It would be worth pulling the anomalies (machines like yours in the galleries – there are at least a couple, but I don’t recall which) and maybe checking when the ads for this model appear in newspapers. That might illuminate a date mismatch or something. However, I’ve always assumed that these serial cutoffs for models might indicate that the model went through some design change and that the note means something like 'serials after this for this model have *these* parts' as opposed to earlier parts lists."

Typeface Specimen:

Links:

Photos:




The floppy carriage return lever.
The floppy carriage return lever.



Dirt.
Dirt.

Oops, sorry lady who runs the antique shop.
Oops, sorry lady who runs the antique shop.




Somebody didn't read the manual.
Somebody didn't read the manual.

Certificate of guarantee along with some unidentifiable Royal related papers underneath.
Certificate of guarantee along with some unidentifiable Royal related papers underneath.

Hunter: Russell Knight (Arcae)

Russell Knight's Typewriter Galleries [ My Collection ] [ My Sightings ]

Status: Typewriter Hunter
Points: 379

Insanity brought to you by SleepDeprivation!



RESEARCH NOTE: When researching the Royal Ensign on a computer with lots of screen real estate, you may find that launching the Royal Serial Number page and the Royal Ensign By Model/Year/Serial page in new browser windows can give you interesting perspectives on changes throughout the model series.